VGT vs CNDX overlap

52% by weight, as of August 31, 2026: heavy overlap. 38 companies appear in both funds; they make up 78% of VGT and 56% of CNDX.

The largest shared positions are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, MU and AMD. Ranked by the smaller of the two weights, which is the part you would own twice.

Out of every $100 split evenly between them, about $52 (half in each fund) buys identical positions. The rest is exposure only one of the two funds gives you: 280 names only in VGT, 63 only in CNDX. Half in each behaves like 21 equally weighted stocks, against 13 for VGT alone and 31 for CNDX alone. Whether that duplication is a problem depends on the mix you want; this is a description, not advice.

Partly: 52% of the money in CNDX and VGT is the same, as of August 31, 2026. CNDX is iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (ISIN IE00B53SZB19), an Irish-domiciled UCITS fund on the Nasdaq-100 index. European brokers generally don't sell US-listed ETFs such as VGT to retail clients, because those funds publish no KID (the PRIIPs key information document); UCITS funds do.

Yes. CNDX also trades as CNX1 (London, GBP), SXRV (Xetra, EUR) and CSNDX (Borsa Italiana, EUR). Each is the same portfolio in another currency, on another exchange or paying its dividends out, so VGT vs SXRV also overlaps 52%.

For every company held by both funds we take the smaller of its two weights and add them up. The weights come from the full holdings files Vanguard and iShares publish, not a top-10 sample, and companies are matched by their ISIN so share classes stay apart. Sector overlap applies the same rule to the issuers' sector labels; "behaves like N equally weighted stocks" is one over the sum of the squared weights.