etf overlap · light overlap
QQQM vs XLC overlap
12% of QQQM and XLC is the same money, spread over 8 companies both funds hold.
Holdings as of October 1, 2026 · source: Invesco (QQQM), SPDR (XLC) · How we measured all 1,035 pairs
- same money
- same companies, extra weight
- only in this fund
The companies you would own twice
What only one of them gives you
AMZNAmazon.com Inc4.05%Where each fund puts its money
QQQM and XLC: what people ask
How much do QQQM and XLC overlap?
12% by weight, as of October 1, 2026: light overlap. 8 companies appear in both funds; they make up 12% of QQQM and 67% of XLC.
Which stocks do QQQM and XLC both hold?
The largest shared positions are META, GOOGL, GOOG, NFLX and TMUS. Ranked by the smaller of the two weights, which is the part you would own twice.
Is it redundant to hold both QQQM and XLC?
Out of every $100 split evenly between them, about $12 (half in each fund) buys identical positions. The rest is exposure only one of the two funds gives you: 94 names only in QQQM, 14 only in XLC. Half in each behaves like 24 equally weighted stocks, against 32 for QQQM alone and 10 for XLC alone. Whether that duplication is a problem depends on the mix you want; this is a description, not advice.
How is ETF overlap calculated here?
For every company held by both funds we take the smaller of its two weights and add them up. The weights come from the full holdings files Invesco and SPDR publish, not a top-10 sample, and companies are matched by their ISIN so share classes stay apart. Sector overlap applies the same rule to the issuers' sector labels; "behaves like N equally weighted stocks" is one over the sum of the squared weights.
Weights come from each issuer's published holdings file and are matched company by company on their ISIN. Cash, futures and currency positions are left out. This page describes what the funds hold; it is not investment advice.