Guest mode: your portfolio is kept in this browser until you connect.

Sys onlineGuest--:-- local

Why are luxury stocks down? LVMH −39.9% and Hermès −39.2% in 2026

LVMH (MC.PA) fell 39.9% and Hermès (RMS.PA) 39.2% in 2026 through Oct. 22, 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 11.9%. For Hermès, no year since at least 2001 started this badly; yet in all six S&P 500 declines of 19% or more since 2000, it fell less than the index. We measured why.

Julien Esnault
Julien Esnault

· 12 min read

Line chart of 2026 price changes from December 31, 2025 to October 22, 2026: the S&P 500 +11.9%, the CAC 40 −4.2%, Hermès −39.2% and LVMH −39.9%, the two luxury stocks falling from January while the S&P 500 rose from April

The short version: in 2026 China is buying less and investors pay far less for luxury profits: LVMH (MC.PA) has lost 39.9% and Hermès International (RMS.PA) 39.2% through the October 22 close, while the S&P 500 gained 11.9%. Hermès’s sales still grow; its price/earnings ratio went from 65.1 to 30.1.

LVMH’s third-quarter sales, out on October 12, grew 1% organically, that is with currency moves and acquisitions taken out; fashion and leather goods fell 5%, in what the company called “a less buoyant environment in China.” On October 22, Hermès reported third-quarter sales up 4.3% at constant exchange rates (currency moves taken out), with Asia excluding Japan flat, and the stock closed −4.94% while the CAC 40 moved −1.39%. No year since at least 2001 started this badly for Hermès.

2026 so far: luxury against the market

Read the first column: the four French fashion and leather houses lost between 29.1% and 39.9%, while the CAC 40 lost 4.2%.

Dec. 31, 2025 → Oct. 22In dollarsUnder its 2026 highUnder its all-time high (date)
LVMH (MC.PA)−39.9%−42.6%−40.5%−57.0% (April 24, 2023)
Hermès (RMS.PA)−39.2%−42.0%−42.4%−54.6% (Feb. 14, 2025)
Christian Dior (CDI.PA)−28.7%−31.9%−30.1%−50.9% (April 14, 2023)
Kering (KER.PA)−29.1%−32.3%−32.7%−73.0% (Aug. 12, 2021)
Moncler (MONC.MI)−19.8%−23.4%−24.8%−37.4% (March 14, 2024)
Burberry (BRBY.L)−14.3%—−20.1%−58.8% (April 25, 2023)
Richemont (CFR.SW)+0.2%—−14.1%−14.1% (Aug. 10, 2026)
L’Oréal (OR.PA)+12.7%+7.6%0.0%−9.6% (May 14, 2024)
CAC 40−4.2%−8.5%−10.5%−10.5% (Aug. 10, 2026)
Euro Stoxx 50+5.0%+0.3%−7.1%−7.1% (Aug. 11, 2026)
S&P 500+11.9%+11.9%−2.0%−2.0% (Oct. 6, 2026)

Price change, dividends left out, in each listing’s own currency. The dollar column adds the euro’s move against the dollar (EUR/USD 1.1747 on Dec. 31, 2025 → 1.1217 on Oct. 22, 2026, the last rate on or before the close, −4.5%). An all-time high is the highest close in each Yahoo series; the Euro Stoxx 50 series starts in March 2007. Yahoo Finance daily closes.

The line runs inside luxury, not between luxury and the rest. Richemont, the Cartier owner, is +0.2% and L’Oréal +12.7%. LVMH’s own quarter splits the same way, jewelry up and leather goods down. LVMH’s close of Oct. 2, 2026 was its lowest since Aug. 10, 2020, and Hermès’s close of Oct. 8, 2026 its lowest since Oct. 13, 2022.

Hermès’s worst start to a year since 2001

Bar chart of Hermès (RMS.PA) share price change from January 1 to October 22 in every year from 2001 to 2026: 2026 ranks last at −39.2%, after 2022 at −15.1%; the best was 2010 at +88.8%
Hermès, January 1 to October 22, each year. Source: Yahoo Finance daily closes.

From January 1 to October 22, Hermès was down in 11 of the 26 years since 2001, and never by more than 15.1% (2022) before 2026. Its worst full calendar year was 2002, at −23.9%. 2026 is already worse, with ten weeks of trading left.

For LVMH, 2026 ranks second of 26, behind 2001 (−43.3%), the year of the dot-com bust and September 11. But in 2001 the whole market fell. 2026 is the first of the 26 years in which LVMH or Hermès was down 30% or more by October 22 while the S&P 500 was up. LVMH trails the S&P 500 by 51.8 points this year; its widest gap before was 38.7 points, in 2024. For Hermès it is 51.2 points, against 22.4 at most before (2009).

When the market fell, Hermès fell less

Luxury’s name as a safe corner comes from falling markets. For each of the six S&P 500 declines of 19% or more since 2000, we measured every stock from the index’s peak close to its trough close.

DeclineS&P 500 peak → troughS&P 500CAC 40LVMHHermèsKering
Dot-com bustMarch 24, 2000 → Oct. 9, 2002−49.1%−58.3%−62.1%−14.6%−72.2%
Financial crisisOct. 9, 2007 → March 9, 2009−56.8%−57.0%−49.9%−22.9%−66.4%
US downgrade, euro crisisApril 29, 2011 → Oct. 3, 2011−19.4%−28.7%−19.1%+41.2%−20.5%
Late-2018 sell-offSept. 20, 2018 → Dec. 24, 2018−19.8%−15.1%−17.2%−15.8%−13.9%
Covid crashFeb. 19, 2020 → March 23, 2020−33.9%−35.9%−25.7%−15.3%−30.8%
Rate hikesJan. 3, 2022 → Oct. 12, 2022−25.4%−19.4%−14.9%−16.8%−37.1%

Price change between the two S&P 500 closes, each stock in euros, dividends left out. Yahoo Finance daily closes.

Hermès fell less than the S&P 500 all 6 times and less than the CAC 40 5 times. Its median was −15.6%, against −29.7% for the S&P 500. In 2011 it even rose 41.2% while the index fell 19.4%. LVMH fell less than the S&P 500 5 times out of 6, a median −22.4%, and came back hardest: a median +72.7% in the 12 months after the trough, against +35.4% for the index. Kering, the Gucci owner, fell more than the S&P 500 4 times.

2026 is the case the six declines do not cover: luxury falling on its own while the market rises. A record of falling less when everything falls says nothing about falling alone.

Sales grew; the price of profit halved

Paired bar chart of price-to-earnings ratios from the companies’ releases: Hermès at 65.1 times profit at its February 14, 2025 high and 30.1 on October 22, 2026; LVMH at 32.2 at its April 24, 2023 high and 17.6 now
Market value against net profit, group share. Sources: Yahoo Finance closes, Hermès and LVMH releases.

A share price is profit times the multiple investors pay for it, the price/earnings ratio. We took the profit from the companies’ own releases (net profit, group share: what belongs to the parent’s shareholders) and the share count from their monthly filings.

Hermès at its highHermès nowLVMH at its highLVMH now
DateFeb. 14, 2025Oct. 22, 2026April 24, 2023Oct. 22, 2026
Share price€2,839.00€1,289.50€902.00€387.80
Market value€299.7 billion€136.1 billion€452.8 billion€191.8 billion
Net profit, group share€4,603 million (2024)€4,516 million (12 months)€14,084 million (2022)€10,877 million (12 months)
Price / earnings65.130.132.217.6

At the high, the last full year reported; now, the last 12 months (2025 plus the first half of 2026, less the first half of 2025). Hermès’s 2025 profit includes France’s exceptional corporate tax surcharge.

Hermès is the clean case. Its last 12 months of sales came to €16,346 million, +7.8% over the 2024 total it had just reported when the stock peaked, and its profit moved −1.9%. The share price fell 54.6%. Nearly all of the fall is the multiple: investors paid 65.1 times profit then and 30.1 times now.

LVMH is half and half. Its profit over the last 12 months is 22.8% under 2022’s, 21.6% per share after buybacks cut the share count from 502.0 million to 494.6 million, and its price/earnings fell 45.2%. At €387.80, the €13 dividend paid for 2025 is a 3.4% yield.

A lower multiple is not a floor: in 2001, LVMH fell 43.3% from January 1 to October 22. Nike’s three earlier 50% falls show the same thing for another brand-name stock: what came after depended on whether profit came back.

What the third quarter said

Third quarter 2026, against 2025Growth
LVMH, group (organic)+1%
LVMH, fashion and leather goods−5%
LVMH, watches and jewelry+6%
LVMH, stores (mainly Sephora)+8%
Hermès, group (constant exchange rates)+4.3%
Hermès, leather goods and saddlery+10.8%
Hermès, Asia excluding Japan0.0%
Hermès, Americas+8.8%

From the companies’ releases of October 12, 2026 (LVMH) and October 22, 2026 (Hermès).

Both releases point at China. LVMH wrote that its quarter reflected “a less buoyant environment in China, while the United States, Europe and Japan saw good growth.” Hermès said Greater China was stable. The difference is in leather goods: +10.8% at Hermès, −5% at LVMH’s fashion and leather goods, Louis Vuitton and Dior among them. In the session after its release LVMH closed −0.12%; by then it was already 41.1% under its January high.

How much LVMH and Hermès your funds hold

Not much, if you own US index funds. We opened the issuers’ full holdings files of the 57 ETFs we track: 11 hold LVMH, and none of the US-stock funds, VOO, VTI or QQQ, holds it or Hermès.

FundNameLVMHHermèsKeringThe three, on $10,000File of
VTVanguard Total World Stock ETF0.092%0.044%0.015%$15.11Sept. 30, 2026
VXUSVanguard Total International Stock ETF0.242%0.115%0.039%$39.64Sept. 30, 2026
VEAVanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF0.334%0.158%0.054%$54.71Sept. 30, 2026
IEFAiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF0.438%0.205%0.069%$71.20Oct. 16, 2026
EFAiShares MSCI EAFE ETF0.512%0.239%0.081%$83.22Oct. 16, 2026
VGKVanguard FTSE Europe ETF0.699%0.331%0.114%$114.39Sept. 30, 2026
IWDAiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Europe)0.120%0.057%0.019%$19.53Oct. 16, 2026
VWCEVanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Europe)0.102%0.048%0.016%$16.63Sept. 30, 2026

Weights from each issuer’s full holdings file, on the date shown. The fall shrank them: a stock that loses 40% weighs less in a fund that holds it by market value.

Even France’s own market fund is not a luxury fund. In the iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) file of October 21, 2026, LVMH is 5.41%, the 7th line, behind TotalEnergies, Schneider Electric, Airbus, Safran, Air Liquide and L’Oréal; Hermès is 13th at 2.61%.

The portfolio X-ray opens your own funds the same way and shows every company you hold through them. VEA and VXUS overlap shows how much two international funds repeat each other, and is my portfolio diversified? how three funds can come down to a few companies.

What to do with it

If you own the shares, the arithmetic of a fall is the first thing to know: from the October 22 close, LVMH needs +132.6% to get back to its April 24, 2023 high, Hermès +120.2% and Kering +271.0%. The drawdown recovery calculator turns any loss into the gain that undoes it, and the crash test replays past market falls on your own holdings.

If you own them through a fund, the 2026 fall is a rounding error in your total: on $10,000 of VT, the three houses together come to $15.11. The X-ray gives the same figure for your own funds, and S&P 500 today follows the index that, unlike luxury, set a record on October 6.

How we measured

Prices are Yahoo Finance daily closes, split-adjusted with dividends left out, each stock in its own currency: MC.PA, RMS.PA, KER.PA and CDI.PA on Euronext Paris, CFR.SW, MONC.MI, BRBY.L, OR.PA, the CAC 40 (^FCHI), the Euro Stoxx 50 (^STOXX50E) and the S&P 500 (^GSPC), through the October 22, 2026 close. Yahoo’s Paris series start in January 2000, so the year ranking covers 2001 to 2026 and “since at least 2001” is the honest wording: earlier years are not in the data. The six declines are the S&P 500’s falls of 19% or more since 2000, close to close, with the peak and trough found in the data. Price/earnings divides market value (close × shares in the capital, from the monthly declarations) by net profit, group share, as printed in the releases. Dividends are left out everywhere; we did not compute a total-return version. The script below reproduces the year ranking and the six declines.

Reproduce it

The script below rebuilds the January-to-October ranking for LVMH, Hermès, the CAC 40 and the S&P 500, and the six-decline table, from Yahoo Finance; we ran it on October 22, 2026.

Show the code53 lines of Python, and what it printed
# Reproduces https://portfolio-terminal.com/blog/why-are-luxury-stocks-down-lvmh-hermes-2026
# pip install pandas yfinance
# LVMH (MC.PA) and Hermes (RMS.PA) in 2026 against every year since 2001 at
# the same date, and in the six S&P 500 declines of 19% or more since 2000.
# Yahoo Finance daily closes, split-adjusted, dividends left out.
import pandas as pd
import yfinance as yf

END = "2026-10-22"  # last close used
TICKERS = {"MC.PA": "LVMH", "RMS.PA": "Hermes", "^FCHI": "CAC 40", "^GSPC": "S&P 500"}

def closes(ticker):
    stop = (pd.Timestamp(END) + pd.Timedelta(days=1)).strftime("%Y-%m-%d")  # end is exclusive
    s = yf.Ticker(ticker).history(start="1999-12-01", end=stop, auto_adjust=False)["Close"]
    s.index = s.index.tz_localize(None).normalize()
    return s.dropna()

px = {t: closes(t) for t in TICKERS}

def change(s, a, b):
    return (s[:b].iloc[-1] / s[:a].iloc[-1] - 1) * 100

print(f"January 1 to {END[5:]}, each year (price change):")
for t, name in TICKERS.items():
    s = px[t]
    by_year = {}
    for y in range(2001, 2027):
        start = s[s.index < f"{y}-01-01"].iloc[-1]
        by_year[y] = (s[:f"{y}-{END[5:]}"].iloc[-1] / start - 1) * 100
    by_year = pd.Series(by_year)
    worst = by_year.sort_values().head(3)
    print(f"  {name:8} 2026 {by_year[2026]:+.1f}%, rank {int(by_year.rank()[2026])} of {len(by_year)}; "
          f"worst: {', '.join(f'{y} {v:+.1f}%' for y, v in worst.items())}")

# The S&P 500's six declines of 19% or more since 2000: the peak and trough
# closes are found inside each window.
WINDOWS = [("2000-01-01", "2002-12-31"), ("2007-07-01", "2009-06-30"), ("2011-04-01", "2011-12-31"),
           ("2018-09-01", "2018-12-31"), ("2020-02-01", "2020-04-30"), ("2022-01-01", "2022-12-31")]
spx = px["^GSPC"]
rows = []
for a, b in WINDOWS:
    w = spx[a:b]
    peak = w.idxmax()
    trough = w[peak:].idxmin()
    rows.append({"peak": peak.date(), "trough": trough.date(),
                 **{name: change(px[t], peak, trough) for t, name in TICKERS.items()}})
table = pd.DataFrame(rows)
print("\nPeak to trough of the S&P 500, each in its own currency:")
print(table.round(1).to_string(index=False))
for name in ["LVMH", "Hermes"]:
    less = (table[name] > table["S&P 500"]).sum()
    print(f"{name} fell less than the S&P 500 in {less} of {len(table)}; median {table[name].median():+.1f}%"
          f" vs {table['S&P 500'].median():+.1f}%")
January 1 to 10-22, each year (price change):
  LVMH     2026 -39.9%, rank 2 of 26; worst: 2001 -43.3%, 2026 -39.9%, 2008 -37.3%
  Hermes   2026 -39.2%, rank 1 of 26; worst: 2026 -39.2%, 2022 -15.1%, 2002 -14.4%
  CAC 40   2026 -4.2%, rank 9 of 26; worst: 2008 -41.3%, 2002 -32.5%, 2001 -26.7%
  S&P 500  2026 +11.9%, rank 17 of 26; worst: 2008 -38.9%, 2002 -22.5%, 2022 -21.3%

Peak to trough of the S&P 500, each in its own currency:
      peak     trough  LVMH  Hermes  CAC 40  S&P 500
2000-03-24 2002-10-09 -62.1   -14.6   -58.3    -49.1
2007-10-09 2009-03-09 -49.9   -22.9   -57.0    -56.8
2011-04-29 2011-10-03 -19.1    41.2   -28.7    -19.4
2018-09-20 2018-12-24 -17.2   -15.8   -15.1    -19.8
2020-02-19 2020-03-23 -25.7   -15.3   -35.9    -33.9
2022-01-03 2022-10-12 -14.9   -16.8   -19.4    -25.4
LVMH fell less than the S&P 500 in 5 of 6; median -22.4% vs -29.7%
Hermes fell less than the S&P 500 in 6 of 6; median -15.6% vs -29.7%

This study measures prices and reported results. It is not investment advice.

Sources: LVMH, third-quarter 2026 revenue, Oct. 12, 2026 · Hermès, third-quarter 2026 revenue, Oct. 22, 2026 · Hermès, 2025 full-year results · Hermès, 2026 half-year results · LVMH, 2025 results · LVMH, 2026 half-year results · Hermès, shares and voting rights, Sept. 30, 2026 · iShares MSCI France ETF holdings · Yahoo Finance, MC.PA history · Yahoo Finance, RMS.PA history

Want this every morning, in plain English?

Get the free daily brief

#market-news#research#stocks

Keep reading

4 min readThe CAC 40 before the October 17 protest, and what past protest weekends did to itThe CAC 40 closed Friday, October 16, 2026 at 7,956.70, 8.8% below its August 10 high. Saturday’s protest has no session to price it until Monday, October 19. Past protest weekends stayed within the usual range.10 min readNike at $35 is not the deal of a lifetime. What would $500 for 10 years do?Nike closed at $35.15 on October 1, 2026, 80.2% under its 2021 record and its lowest close since October 2013. We priced a $500, 10-year bet in eight scenarios from Nike's own numbers: it beats an S&P 500 fund's median decade ($1,329) only if Nike earns its 2022 record profit again.5 min readIs My Portfolio Actually Diversified?A portfolio can look busy and still be concentrated. This checklist helps you spot hidden overlap in positions, sectors, currencies, and risk.

cite: Julien Esnault, “Why are luxury stocks down? LVMH −39.9% and Hermès −39.2% in 2026”, Portfolio Terminal, 2026-10-22. plain-text version for AI tools

Try it on your own holdings

portfolio terminal

Measure your own portfolio’s risk, not a textbook one.

Import your positions from any broker and see your volatility, beta, drawdown and correlations every morning.

Wall Street in 60s, every morning. What’s in it

One short email before the open. Unsubscribe anytime.