VT vs CNDX overlap

32% by weight, as of September 30, 2026: moderate overlap. 99 companies appear in both funds; they make up 32% of VT and 99% of CNDX.

The largest shared positions are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Ranked by the smaller of the two weights, which is the part you would own twice.

Out of every $100 split evenly between them, about $32 (half in each fund) buys identical positions. The rest is exposure only one of the two funds gives you: 10,056 names only in VT, 2 only in CNDX. Half in each behaves like 60 equally weighted stocks, against 128 for VT alone and 31 for CNDX alone. Whether that duplication is a problem depends on the mix you want; this is a description, not advice.

CNDX is iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (ISIN IE00B53SZB19), an Irish-domiciled UCITS fund on the Nasdaq-100 index. Next to VT, 32% of the money is the same, spread over 99 companies both hold, as of September 30, 2026.

Yes. CNDX also trades as CNX1 (London, GBP), SXRV (Xetra, EUR) and CSNDX (Borsa Italiana, EUR). Each is the same portfolio in another currency, on another exchange or paying its dividends out, so VT vs SXRV also overlaps 32%.

For every company held by both funds we take the smaller of its two weights and add them up. The weights come from the full holdings files Vanguard and iShares publish, not a top-10 sample, and companies are matched by their ISIN so share classes stay apart. Sector overlap applies the same rule to the issuers' sector labels; "behaves like N equally weighted stocks" is one over the sum of the squared weights.