QQQM vs VWCE overlap

35% by weight, as of September 30, 2026: moderate overlap. 96 companies appear in both funds; they make up 98% of QQQM and 35% of VWCE.

The largest shared positions are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Ranked by the smaller of the two weights, which is the part you would own twice.

Out of every $100 split evenly between them, about $35 (half in each fund) buys identical positions. The rest is exposure only one of the two funds gives you: 6 names only in QQQM, 3,699 only in VWCE. Half in each behaves like 57 equally weighted stocks, against 32 for QQQM alone and 107 for VWCE alone. Whether that duplication is a problem depends on the mix you want; this is a description, not advice.

VWCE is Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (ISIN IE00BK5BQT80), an Irish-domiciled UCITS fund on the FTSE All-World index. Next to QQQM, 35% of the money is the same, spread over 96 companies both hold, as of September 30, 2026.

Yes. VWCE also trades as VWRA (London, USD) and VWRP (London, GBP), and VWRL (ISIN IE00B3RBWM25) is its distributing share class. Each is the same portfolio in another currency, on another exchange or paying its dividends out, so QQQM vs VWRA also overlaps 35%.

For every company held by both funds we take the smaller of its two weights and add them up. The weights come from the full holdings files Invesco and Vanguard publish, not a top-10 sample, and companies are matched by their ISIN so share classes stay apart. Sector overlap applies the same rule to the issuers' sector labels; "behaves like N equally weighted stocks" is one over the sum of the squared weights.