QQQM vs EIMI overlap

0.2% by weight, as of October 1, 2026: little overlap. 1 companies appear in both funds; they make up 0.2% of QQQM and 0.3% of EIMI.

The largest shared positions are PDD. Ranked by the smaller of the two weights, which is the part you would own twice.

Out of every $100 split evenly between them, about $0 (half in each fund) buys identical positions. The rest is exposure only one of the two funds gives you: 101 names only in QQQM, 2,887 only in EIMI. Half in each behaves like 68 equally weighted stocks, against 32 for QQQM alone and 37 for EIMI alone. Whether that duplication is a problem depends on the mix you want; this is a description, not advice.

EIMI is iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (ISIN IE00BKM4GZ66), an Irish-domiciled UCITS fund on the MSCI Emerging Markets IMI index. Next to QQQM, 0.2% of the money is the same, spread over 1 companies both hold, as of October 1, 2026.

Yes. EIMI also trades as EMIM (London, GBP; Euronext Amsterdam, EUR) and IS3N (Xetra, EUR). Each is the same portfolio in another currency, on another exchange or paying its dividends out, so QQQM vs IS3N also overlaps 0.2%.

For every company held by both funds we take the smaller of its two weights and add them up. The weights come from the full holdings files Invesco and iShares publish, not a top-10 sample, and companies are matched by their ISIN so share classes stay apart. Sector overlap applies the same rule to the issuers' sector labels; "behaves like N equally weighted stocks" is one over the sum of the squared weights.