IWF vs EIMI overlap

0.3% by weight, as of October 14, 2026: little overlap. 4 companies appear in both funds; they make up 0.3% of IWF and 0.8% of EIMI.

The largest shared positions are NU, AU, SCCO and AUGO. Ranked by the smaller of the two weights, which is the part you would own twice.

Out of every $100 split evenly between them, about $0 (half in each fund) buys identical positions. The rest is exposure only one of the two funds gives you: 367 names only in IWF, 2,884 only in EIMI. Half in each behaves like 53 equally weighted stocks, against 20 for IWF alone and 37 for EIMI alone. Whether that duplication is a problem depends on the mix you want; this is a description, not advice.

EIMI is iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (ISIN IE00BKM4GZ66), an Irish-domiciled UCITS fund on the MSCI Emerging Markets IMI index. Next to IWF, 0.3% of the money is the same, spread over 4 companies both hold, as of October 14, 2026.

Yes. EIMI also trades as EMIM (London, GBP; Euronext Amsterdam, EUR) and IS3N (Xetra, EUR). Each is the same portfolio in another currency, on another exchange or paying its dividends out, so IWF vs IS3N also overlaps 0.3%.

For every company held by both funds we take the smaller of its two weights and add them up. The weights come from the full holdings files iShares publish, not a top-10 sample, and companies are matched by their ISIN so share classes stay apart. Sector overlap applies the same rule to the issuers' sector labels; "behaves like N equally weighted stocks" is one over the sum of the squared weights.