etf overlap · little overlap
EEM vs IWF overlap
0.3% of EEM and IWF is the same money, spread over 4 companies both funds hold.
Holdings as of September 24, 2026 · source: iShares (EEM), iShares (IWF) · How we measured all 1,035 pairs
- same money
- same companies, extra weight
- only in this fund
What only one of them gives you
Where each fund puts its money
EEM and IWF: what people ask
How much do EEM and IWF overlap?
0.3% by weight, as of September 24, 2026: little overlap. 4 companies appear in both funds; they make up 1.0% of EEM and 0.3% of IWF.
Which stocks do EEM and IWF both hold?
The largest shared positions are NU, ANG, SCCO and AUGO. Ranked by the smaller of the two weights, which is the part you would own twice.
Is it redundant to hold both EEM and IWF?
Out of every $100 split evenly between them, about $0 (half in each fund) buys identical positions. The rest is exposure only one of the two funds gives you: 1,165 names only in EEM, 367 only in IWF. Half in each behaves like 47 equally weighted stocks, against 28 for EEM alone and 20 for IWF alone. Whether that duplication is a problem depends on the mix you want; this is a description, not advice.
How is ETF overlap calculated here?
For every company held by both funds we take the smaller of its two weights and add them up. The weights come from the full holdings files iShares publish, not a top-10 sample, and companies are matched by their ISIN so share classes stay apart. Sector overlap applies the same rule to the issuers' sector labels; "behaves like N equally weighted stocks" is one over the sum of the squared weights.
Weights come from each issuer's published holdings file and are matched company by company on their ISIN. Cash, futures and currency positions are left out. This page describes what the funds hold; it is not investment advice.