XLK vs EIMI overlap

None by holdings, as of September 24, 2026: no company appears in both funds. By sector, 40% of their money sits in the same sectors, led by Information Technology.

None. XLK and EIMI have no holding in common.

No. Out of every $100 split evenly between them, none buys the same company. Half in each gives you 2,963 different holdings that behave like 42 equally weighted stocks, against 15 for XLK alone and 37 for EIMI alone. Whether that mix suits you depends on what you want to own; this is a description, not advice.

EIMI is iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (ISIN IE00BKM4GZ66), an Irish-domiciled UCITS fund on the MSCI Emerging Markets IMI index. Next to XLK, it holds no company in common, as of September 24, 2026.

Yes. EIMI also trades as EMIM (London, GBP; Euronext Amsterdam, EUR) and IS3N (Xetra, EUR). Each is the same portfolio in another currency, on another exchange or paying its dividends out, so XLK and IS3N share no company either.

For every company held by both funds we take the smaller of its two weights and add them up. The weights come from the full holdings files SPDR and iShares publish, not a top-10 sample, and companies are matched by their ISIN so share classes stay apart. Sector overlap applies the same rule to the issuers' sector labels; "behaves like N equally weighted stocks" is one over the sum of the squared weights.